Great Xi,

Dashun Tongbao

(Reverse With Broad Inner Border Version)

大西

大順通寶

(背肥廓版)

Item number: A3325

Year: AD 1644-1646

Material: Brass

Size: 25.3 x 25.3 mm

Weight: 4.4 g

Provenance:

1. Spink 2023

2. Dr. Werner Klaus Burger Collection

This is a brass coin cast during the late Ming dynasty by Zhang Xianzhong, who rose in rebellion in Shaanxi and, in AD 1644, captured Chengdu in Sichuan. There, he established the Daxi regime and adopted the reign title Dashun. The coin was issued under this newly proclaimed authority.

The coin adopts the traditional square-holed round form characteristic of the Han cultural sphere. The obverse inscription reads “Da Shun Tong Bao” in regular script (kaishu). The characters are full-bodied and fluid in brushwork. In the character “Tong,” the radical “Yong” (甬) begins with a “マ”-shaped stroke forming a triangular closure, and the “辶” radical ends in a curved stroke at the base. All four characters are connected to the square hole (穿) and to the surrounding rim (連輪). The coin’s reverse features a relatively broad inner rim surrounding the central hole, while the rest of the reverse surface remains plain and uninscribed.

According to the Ming History, “Biographies of the Rebel Bandits”, in the seventeenth year of the Chongzhen reign (AD 1644), after capturing Sichuan, Zhang Xianzhong proclaimed himself King of Great Western (Daxi Guowang), and later within the same year declared himself Emperor of Great Western, designating Chengdu as the Western Capital and adopting the reign title Dashun. It is recorded that he confiscated Buddhist statues from temples and bronze vessels from princely residences to melt down for the casting of “Dashun Tongbao” coins. Perhaps for this reason, the coinage is notable for its high-quality bronze, and numismatic catalogues consistently praise these coins for their lustrous surfaces and fine craftsmanship. In addition to the plain reverse type, variants exist with the reverse inscribed with the characters “Gong” (工), “Hu” (戶), and “Chuan” (川), of which the “Hu” and “Chuan” types are especially rare.

Peng Zunsi’s Shu Bi notes: “The people were ordered to hang placards identifying themselves as ‘obedient subjects’ (shunmin), fixed to the top of their hats using the new Dashun coin.” Similarly, Shen Xunwei’s Shu Nan Xulu records: “The bandit ordered that all cities and towns under his control declare themselves obedient subjects without fear. Every household was given a Dashun coin, and wearing it on the forehead guaranteed survival.” Thus, the Dashun Tongbao became a marker of loyalty or submission to Zhang’s regime. Even into the Qianlong reign (AD 1736–1796), there are records of these coins being used by women as hair ornaments. It is also said that sailors carried these coins as huaqian (decorative or amuletic coins) to invoke good fortune.

Zhang Xianzhong, a native of Xichong in Sichuan, was one of the most prominent leaders of peasant uprisings in the late Ming period. Born into poverty, he served as a cavalry officer before joining the rebellion due to dissatisfaction with the political situation and official oppression. He was active in Huguang and Shaanxi, and, along with Li Zicheng, was among the most renowned rebel leaders of the time—often paired in the saying, “Li Zicheng the Roaming King; Zhang Xianzhong the Eighth Prince.” Zhang’s forces were known for their mobility and tactical agility, repeatedly defeating Ming forces and expanding rapidly. Toward the end of the Chongzhen reign, he moved his campaign to the southwest and established the Daxi regime in Chengdu, assuming the title of King of Great Western and adopting the reign title Dashun. After entering Sichuan, he formally set up a bureaucratic system and proclaimed his own reign title in an effort to establish governance. However, his rule relied heavily on military coercion, and his decrees were largely ineffective. Military discipline deteriorated, and combined with years of warfare, famine, and disease, social order collapsed, and civilian suffering intensified.

Zhang’s troops carried out large-scale massacres in numerous locations, resulting in drastic population decline. Historical records even mention tigers roaming freely in once-bustling city streets. The term “Massacre of Shu” (tu Shu) became synonymous with the atrocities committed, particularly in cities such as Chengdu and Chongqing, which suffered the most severe devastation. In the fourth year of the Shunzhi reign (AD 1647), Zhang Xianzhong was ambushed and killed by Qing forces at Mount Fenghuang. He was forty-two years old. Following his death, his remaining forces, led by his adopted son Sun Kewang, retreated into Yunnan, where they eventually surrendered to the Qing court in AD 1657.

物件編號: A3325

年代: 公元 1644-1646 年

材質: 黃銅

尺寸: 25.3 x 25.3 mm

重量: 4.4 g

來源:

1. 斯賓克拍賣行 2023

2. 布威納博士舊藏

這是一枚明朝末年,起兵於陝西的張獻忠在公元1644年攻克四川成都,於當地自立「大西」政權並以其「大順」年號所鑄造的銅錢。

錢幣形制為漢文化圈傳統的方孔圓錢。錢面錢文「大順通寶」楷書。文字豐腴,筆畫流暢。「通」字「甬」旁字首「マ」封口呈三角。「辶」旁底捺曲筆。四字均接穿連輪。

錢幕錢穿周廓較寬,其餘地章光素無文。

據《明史·流賊傳》載,崇禎十七年(公元1644年),張獻忠攻克四川後,自稱大西國王,同年改自稱大西皇帝,以成都為西京,改元大順。其並沒收寺廟的佛像和藩王府內的銅器以鑄造「大順通寶」。或許是因此銅質頗佳,錢譜中皆以光潤精整著稱。錢幣除了光背版本外,尚有背面鐫刻「工、戶、川」字的種類,其中以「戶、川」兩者最為罕見。

彭遵泗《蜀碧》載,「令民間家懸順民號帖,以大順新錢釘之帽頂。」沈荀蔚《蜀難敘略》中亦載,「賊下令曰,凡爾處市鎮俱順民,毋恐,家給大順錢,綴於首可不死。」大順通寶此時成為是否「順民」的標誌。直到乾隆年間,仍有「至今得者作婦女簪花」的紀錄。另外據稱出海的水手會收藏此錢作為花錢,以求好運。

張獻忠,四川西充人,為明末重要的農民起義領袖之一。早年出身貧苦,曾任驍騎校,後因不滿時局與官府壓迫而參與起義軍,活躍於湖廣、陝西一帶。與李自成齊名,時稱「闖王李自成,八大王張獻忠」。張軍以機動靈活著稱,多次擊敗明軍圍剿,勢力迅速擴張。崇禎末年轉戰西南,於四川成都建立大西政權,自稱大西王,年號「大順」。入蜀後,張獻忠形式上設置百官、頒布年號,試圖建立統治秩序。然而,其統治倚賴軍事壓制,政令難以推行,軍紀敗壞,加以四川連年戰亂、饑荒與疫疾,導致社會秩序迅速崩潰,民生極度困苦。張軍在多地進行大規模屠殺,使得人口大幅下降並留下老虎出沒於鬧市街道上的紀錄,後世有「屠蜀」之稱,尤以成都、重慶等地最為慘烈。 順治四年(公元1647年),張獻忠在鳳凰山遇清軍被殺,時年四十二歲。其死後餘部在義子孫可望領導下退入雲南,直到公元1657年降於清廷為止。

類似/相同物件 請看:

臺灣 國立歷史博物館 National Museum of History

https://collections.culture.tw/Object.aspx?SYSUID=14&RNO=NzgtMDA1NzU=

中國 國家博物館 National Museum of China

https://www.chnmuseum.cn/zp/zpml/hb/202106/t20210608_250192.shtml

更多相關訊息請參考:

孫仲匯主編,《中國錢幣大辭典·元明編》,北京:中華書局,2012。

刘徵主编,《大明泉谱》,北京:中国商业出版社,2009。

Schjoth, Fredrick. Chinese Currency, Currency of the Far East. Iola: Krause Publications, 1965.

劉敏,〈大西政權鑄幣考〉,《四川金融》1998:2(成都,1998),頁53-54。

彭信威,《中国货币史》,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2020。

上田信著;葉韋利譯,《海與帝國:明清時代》,新北:臺灣商務印書館,2019。

返回頂端