Vietnam

Hexagonal-Pattern & Floral Motif Blue-and-White Bowl

越南

青花龜甲錦地花卉紋碗

Item number: P4

Year: late 15th–late 16th c. AD

Material: Porcelain

Size: 15.2 x 7.7 cm

Provenance: Guang Ya Zhai 2026

This object is a blue-and-white bowl adorned with a diaper pattern of hexagonal tortoise-shell motifs and floral designs.

In terms of morphology, the bowl features an everted rim, slanting walls, and a circular footring. The transparent glaze is tinged with a subtle greenish-yellow hue, displaying a dense network of fine crackles across its surface. This exemplifies the typical tactile profile of Annamese blue-and-white glaze and clay bodies from the fifteenth to sixteenth centuries AD, a characteristic stemming from the traditional Vietnamese practice of incorporating wood ash as a flux into the glaze mixture. The exterior wall is decorated with a hexagonal tortoise-shell motif, alternative termed the coin pattern due to its resemblance to overlapping old cash coins with central holes; such continuous, repetitive geometric patterns are designated as diaper grounds (jin-di). These hexagonal cells are interspersed with small florets, while the area adjacent to the foot is painted with simplified lotus-petal panels. The interior wall features scrolls of grass and floral designs executed in dots and lines, while the center of the bowl is painted with a simplified cross motif flanked by double phoenixes. Among these, the cross motif, the hexagonal tortoise-shell diaper, and the floral patterns all constitute decorative designs frequently observed during the Ming Dynasty AD.

Although the ornamentation of this vessel inherits the diaper grounds, vine-scrolls, cross motifs, and lotus petals characteristic of Chinese blue-and-white porcelain, its brushwork is comparatively coarse and loose. The edges of the blue-and-white motifs exhibit slight bleeding or blurred borders. This effect occurs because the cobalt pigment was partially absorbed by the clay body, causing the edges to gently diffuse—a visual quality known as shibori-de (絞手) within the aesthetic framework of Japanese tea utensils. The coloration is relatively pale, with some brushstrokes even bordering on greyish-blue, suggesting the possible use of cobalt pigments imported from Yunnan, China. Vietnamese blue-and-white wares display varied treatments of the base, including an iron-brown wash, an unglazed surface, or a coating of transparent glaze; the footring of the present piece reveals an unglazed contact surface with faint traces of reddish iron spots (flint red), while the interior base within the footring remains unglazed.

Multiple pinholes or crawling defects are visible on the exterior of the vessel body, likely induced by the uneven internal stress within the glaze layer. On the interior, an instance of smoke-staining (chuan-yan) can be observed, manifesting as dark spots caused by poor thermal convection within the kiln.

From the mid-fourteenth to the early fifteenth century AD, kilns in northern Vietnam—notably those around Thăng Long and the early Bat Trang area—demonstrated remarkable dynamism amid the rising tide of maritime export trade, extending the reach of their glazed ceramics to the western gateways of Japan. During this period, Vietnamese ceramic craftsmanship was undergoing a transitional phase from traditional wares to mature blue-and-white production, with the output consisting predominantly of large dishes and bowls manufactured to meet the demand for daily utilitarian tableware overseas. Regarding technical execution, Vietnamese potters extensively utilized local iron-rich pigments to sketch sparse, fluid, and refined chrysanthemum spray motifs in the center of the vessel’s interior base, while the interior and exterior rims were encircled by continuous scrolling vines. A selection of premium-grade wares began to assimilate the decorative compositions of late Yuan Dynasty AD blue-and-white porcelain from China, experimenting with the introduction of cobalt pigments for painted decoration and employing iron-brown lines to delineate the boundaries of the motifs. Constrained by contemporary clay levigation techniques and kiln firing temperatures, and to prevent the stoneware clay body from sagging or warping under intense kiln heat, Vietnamese potters devised a unique micro-morphological adaptation by making the footrings wide and low. This structural attribute became the most recognizable localized hallmark of Vietnamese export ceramics during this era.

Following the successful expulsion of the Ming military forces and the reclamation of national independence by Vietnam in AD 1427, the domestic ceramic industry entered a century-long golden age under the patronage and promotion of the Lê Dynasty AD. During this epoch, the ceramic industry centered around the Chu Đậu and Bat Trang kilns in the Red River Delta experienced unprecedented prosperity. This era not only produced pinnacle masterpieces such as the celebrated blue-and-white vase now housed in Turkey, which bears a inscription dating it to the eighth year of the Đại Hòa era (AD 1450), but also propelled a vast volume of commodities into the insular Southeast Asian market, successfully filling the commercial vacuum left by the shifting maritime policies of China. Concurrently, however, direct exports from Vietnamese kilns to the more distant main islands of Japan reached a state of near-stagnation; their products entered the gusuku fortresses of the Ryukyu Kingdom primarily through the international entrepôt trade networks of Ryukyu, maintaining an aura of extreme rarity. Throughout this phase of production, Vietnamese potters demonstrated superlative command over complex, composite decorative techniques, including molding, underglaze blue painting, and overglaze enamel (red and green palette) applications. Whether manufacturing octagonal pear-shaped bottles or intricate double-line lotus-petal dishes, they exhibited a technical confidence capable of rivaling Jingdezhen in China. Meanwhile, the unique “iron wash” technique indigenous to Vietnam—the application of a layer of iron-rich slip inside the footring to prevent adhesion during firing—became an institutionalized standard for export commodities.

By the mid-sixteenth century AD, the stringent enforcement of maritime prohibitions by the Ming Dynasty AD generated an urgent demand in international markets for Southeast Asian resources and raw silk. Leveraging its abundant raw silk output and highly developed ceramic industries, northern Vietnam once again emerged as a crucial nexus of international maritime commerce. To cater to Japanese merchants who began sailing directly to Giao Chỉ aboard Shuinsen (Red Seal ships) after the 1590s AD, the kilns of northern Vietnam embarked on large-scale, customized, and market-directed production. The most renowned vessels of this period—the cylindrical tea bowls termed tombo-de (dragonfly wares) or shibori-de (絞手) by Japanese tea masters—were precisely the products of Vietnamese potters deliberately adapting their craft to suit the rustic aesthetics of overseas grass-hut tea ceremonies (wabi-cha). Vietnamese kilns applied their distinctive high-calcium ash glaze over a layer of white slip, leaving three spur marks on the interior base resulting from stack-firing techniques. To satisfy the Japanese tea masters’ preference for irregularity and asymmetrical imperfection, potters broke away from conventional wheel-throwing standards, intentionally compressing the body of the bowl by hand to create a distorted, oval cross-section. In terms of ornamentation, Vietnamese painters completely abandoned the dense, scrolling vine patterns standard to their domestic repertoire, opting instead for minimalist, isolated strokes executed with dark local cobalt that easily bled into the soft glaze. They sketched dragonflies, prawns, birds, and bamboo grasses, generating a natural, diffused shibori effect reminiscent of indigo-dyed textiles.

However, this customized prosperity, which relied heavily on specific overseas markets, encountered a cataclysmic historical turning point between the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries AD. With the complete maturation of the private kiln system at Jingdezhen during the late Ming Dynasty AD—particularly the geometric explosion in the output of export porcelains like Kraak ware and Ko-sometsuke (old blue-and-white) tailored specifically for the Japanese market—Chinese porcelain, characterized by a whiter body, perfectly vitrified glaze, and highly competitive pricing, swept across the globe like a tidal wave. Confronted by the overwhelming combination of massive volume and technical superiority from Jingdezhen, the commercial viability of Vietnamese ceramics was ruthlessly squeezed out, both within its traditional strongholds in Southeast Asia and within the specialized tea utensil markets of Japan. This international chain reaction, triggered by the comprehensive resurgence of production capacity and technical innovation at Jingdezhen, directly caused the irreversible decline of Vietnamese export ceramics from the late sixteenth century AD onwards. By the mid-seventeenth century AD, the implementation of national seclusion policies (sakoku) by the Japanese government completely severed the Shuinsen trade routes. This formal closure brought an end to decades of specialized, market-directed production by the Red River Delta kilns, and Vietnamese ceramics gradually retreated from the mainstream global export arena, reverting to a domestic industry primarily serving local and monastic religious needs.

物件編號: P4

年代: 15世紀末 – 16世紀末

材料: 陶瓷

尺寸: 15.2 x 7.7 cm

來源: 廣雅齋 2026

這是一個青花龜甲錦地花卉紋碗。

器型上,碗緣侈口,碗側斜腹,碗底為圈足,透明釉微泛青黃,釉面可見細密開片,呈現十五至十六世紀安南青花典型的胎釉風貌,這是由於越南窯場傳統上經常使用草木灰拌入釉料作為熔劑。外壁飾六角龜甲,或稱錢紋,因形似帶孔元錢相疊,連續不斷的重複圖樣則稱為錦地,格內點綴小花,近足處繪變形蓮瓣紋;內壁飾點線卷草花卉,碗心繪簡化的雙鳳十字紋。其中十字紋、六角龜甲、花卉紋皆為明代常見紋飾。

此器紋樣承襲中國青花瓷的錦地、卷草、十字紋與蓮瓣等裝飾,然筆法粗略鬆動。青花邊緣微帶毛邊,這是由於青料被胎土稍微吸收後,使邊緣略帶暈開的感覺,於日本的茶器審美中,被稱為「絞手」,顏色較淡,部分筆觸甚至呈灰藍色,可能使用來自中國雲南的青料。越南青花底部可見鐵褐色洗底、露胎或透明釉等不同處理;本件圈足接地面露胎,微帶火石紅,足內底心未施釉。

器身外側可見多處有縮釉孔,可能是由於釉質的內應力不均所致。內側有一處串煙,是因窯內熱對流不佳所產生的黑斑。

在14世紀中期至15世紀初期,越南北部的窯廠(如昇龍周邊及早期缽場一帶)在外銷浪潮中展現了獨特的生命力,並將其施釉陶瓷的觸角延伸至日本的西大門。這一時期的越南製瓷工藝正處於從傳統向成熟青花轉型的過渡期,產品多為滿足海外日用膳食需求的大型盤、碗。在工藝表現上,越南陶工廣泛使用本土富含鐵質的彩料,在器物內底中心以率筆、洗練的線條勾勒出菊花折枝紋,內外口沿則圍繞著纏枝蔓草紋;部分高檔產品則開始吸收中國元代晚期青花瓷的裝飾構圖,嘗試引入鈷料進行彩繪,並以鐵褐彩線條作為紋飾的界線。受限於當時胎土原料的淘洗技術與窯爐燒成溫度,為了防止炻器質地的胎骨在窯火中軟塌變形,越南陶工發展出了一套獨特的微觀形制,即將底足製作得寬而低矮,這成為該時期越南外銷陶瓷最具辨識度的在地特徵。

隨著公元1427年越南成功驅逐明朝軍隊、恢復國家獨立,越南的陶瓷產業在黎朝的推動下迎來了長達一個世紀的黃金時代。這段時期,以紅河三角洲的朱豆窯和缽場窯為核心的窯業高度繁榮,不僅燒造出了現藏於土耳其、帶有1450年正和八年紀年的青花大瓶等巔峰之作,更將大量產品推向島嶼東南亞市場,成功填補了中國瓷器因政策轉變而留下的市場真空。然而此時,越南窯廠對更遙遠的日本本土主要島嶼的直接輸出幾乎處於停滯狀態,其產品主要藉由琉球王國的國際中轉貿易網絡,以極其珍稀的姿態進入琉球的御城之中。在這一階段的生產中,越南陶工展現出高超的模印、青花、以及釉上五彩的複合裝飾技藝,無論是八方梨形瓶還是細緻的雙線蓮瓣紋盤,都展現出與中國景德鎮分庭抗禮的技術自信。與此同時,越南本土獨創的底蓮工藝——在圈足內底塗抹一層防粘連的鐵汁,也在此時成為標準的外銷器物規範。

到了16世紀中期,由於明朝嚴格執行海禁,使得國際市場對東南亞物資與生絲的需求極其迫切。越南北部憑藉豐富的生絲產量與發達的窯業,再次成為國際貿易的風暴中心。為了迎合在1590年代以後搭乘朱印船直接前來交趾進行貿易的日本商人,越南北部的窯廠展開了大規模的客製化定向生產。這時期最著名、被日本茶人稱為蜻蜓盞或絞手的筒形茶碗,便是越南陶工為了適應海外草庵茶道審美而特別調整的產物。越南窯廠在白化妝土上施以特有的高鈣灰釉,並在內底留下了三個疊燒用的支釘痕;為了滿足日本茶人對不規則、殘缺美的追求,陶工打破常規的製瓷慣例,用手刻意擠壓碗腹,製造出歪斜的卵圓形橫截面。在裝飾上,越南畫工也完全背離了本土標準的繁密纏枝紋,改以簡練、孤立的筆觸,用深色且容易在軟釉中暈散的國產鈷料,勾勒出蜻蜓、蝦、鳥與竹草,創造出如藍染織物般自然洇散的絞手意境。

然而,這種高度依賴特定海外市場的客製化繁榮,在16世紀末至17世紀初遭遇了致命的歷史轉折。隨著中國明代末期景德鎮民窯體制的徹底成熟,特別是克拉克瓷與高度適應日本市場的古染付等外銷瓷產量出現幾何級數的大爆發,成色更為瑩白、釉面完美玻化且價格極具競爭力的中國瓷器重新如潮水般席捲全球。面對景德鎮這種兼具龐大產量與技術優勢的強烈衝擊,不論是在東南亞的傳統基本盤市場,還是日本的專門化茶道具市場,越南陶瓷的競爭空間都被無情地全面擠壓。這場由中國景德鎮產量全面復甦與技術爆發所引發的國際連帶效應,直接導致了越南外銷陶瓷自16世紀末開始走向無法逆轉的衰敗。到了17世紀中葉,隨著日本實施鎖國政策徹底切斷了朱印船航線,這段由紅河三角洲窯廠維繫了數十年的定向專門化生產正式宣告終結,越南陶瓷也逐步退出了國際外銷的主流舞台,回歸為本土與寺廟宗教服務的內銷產業。

類似/相同物件 請看:

美國 西華盛頓大學 惠廷頓亞洲陶瓷收藏 Whittington Collection of Asian Ceramics

https://mabel.wwu.edu/bowl-27#page/1

香港大學美術博物館 University Museum and Art Gallery, HKU

https://tipeslowly.github.io/ceramics/3_blue_and_white/#deepzoom-1642561394683367000

中國 贛州市客家文化遺產研究院 Ganzhou Hakka Cultural Heritage Research Institute

https://www.hakka0797.com/?hakkaPattern_35/2188.html

臺灣 國立故宮博物院 Naitional Palace Museum

https://digitalarchive.npm.gov.tw/Collection/Detail/76761?dep=U

臺灣 國立故宮博物院 Naitional Palace Museum

https://digitalarchive.npm.gov.tw/opendata/Pub/Detail/25911?dep=U&mode=full

更多相關訊息請參考:

Stevenson, John, and John Guy. Vietnamese Ceramics: A Separate Tradition. Chicago, Art Media Resources with Avery Press, 1997.

Richards, Dick. South-East Asian Ceramics: Thai, Vietnamese, and Khmer: From the Collection of the Art Gallery of South Australia. Selangor, Oxford University Press, 1995.

Kikuchi, Yuriko. A History of Maritime Trade in Northern Vietnam, 12th to 18th Centuries: Archaeological Investigations in Vandon and Phohien. Singapore, Springer Nature Singapore, 2021.

徐朝輝,《圖解明代瓷器工藝痕跡・明青花瓷卷》,成都:四川美術出版社,2012。

余繼明,《青花瓷片紋飾圖鑑》,杭州:浙江大學出版社,2007。

鄭培凱主編,《十二至十五世紀中國外銷瓷與海外貿易國際研討會論文集》,香港:中華書局(香港)有限公司,2005。

返回頂端