Vietnam

Hexagonal-Pattern & Floral Motif Blue-and-White Bowl 2

越南

青花龜甲錦地花卉紋碗 2

Item number: P5

Year: late 15th–late 16th c. AD

Material: Porcelain

Size: 14.7 x 6.9 cm

Provenance: Guang Ya Zhai 2026

This is a blue-and-white porcelain bowl adorned with a floral design against a hexagonal tortoiseshell diaper ground.

In terms of morphology, the bowl features an everted rim, slanting walls, and is supported by a ring foot. The transparent glaze exhibits a subtle greenish-yellow tint with a fine network of crackles across the surface, characteristic of the typical body and glaze aesthetics found in fifteenth-to-sixteenth-century Annamese blue-and-white ceramics. This visual quality stems from the traditional practice of Vietnamese kilns incorporating wood ash into the glaze formulation as a flux. The exterior wall is decorated with a continuous, repetitive diaper pattern consisting of hexagons, alternatively referred to as a cash-motif due to its resemblance to overlapping circular coins with central perforations. Each hexagonal cell is punctuated by a small fleuret, while the zone adjacent to the foot is painted with conventionalised lotus panels or lingzhi cloud scrolls. The interior wall is embellished with scrolled floral and foliate bands executed in dots and lines, while the center of the well contains a circular floral medallion comprising a small central blossom encircled by interlocking leafy scrolls. Both the hexagonal tortoiseshell motif and the floral scrolls represent decorative designs frequently encountered during the Ming Dynasty.

The ornamentation of this vessel inherits the diaper grounds, classic scrolls, cruciform motifs, and lotus petals characteristic of Chinese blue-and-white porcelain, yet it is rendered with looser, more cursive brushwork. The edges of the underglaze blue designs exhibit a slight bleeding effect, which occurs when the cobalt pigment is partially absorbed into the clay body, causing the outlines to appear subtly diffused. Within the context of Japanese tea-utensil aesthetics, this specific bleeding effect is termed shibori-te (絞手). The coloration is somewhat pale, with some brushstrokes verging on a grayish-blue hue, suggesting the possible employment of cobalt ore sourced from Yunnan, China. Vietnamese blue-and-white wares display a variety of treatments on their bases, including a ferruginous wash (chocolate bottom), an unglazed surface, or a transparent glaze; the base of the ring foot on this specific specimen is left unglazed where it meets the kiln floor, showing a faint iron-red scorching, whilst the central area within the foot remains unglazed.

Numerous pinholes resulting from crawling glaze are visible on the exterior of the body, potentially induced by an uneven distribution of internal stress within the glaze layer. The interior exhibits several instances of smoke staining, manifest as dark blemishes caused by defective thermal convection inside the kiln chamber.

During the mid-fourteenth to early fifteenth centuries, kilns located in northern Vietnam, particularly those surrounding Thăng Long and the early Bat Trang region, manifested a distinctive vitality within the burgeoning waves of maritime export trade, extending the reach of their glazed ceramics to the western gateways of Japan. The Vietnamese ceramic industry of this era was undergoing a transitional phase from traditional methods to a mature stage of blue-and-white production, with its output predominantly comprising large-scale plates and bowls manufactured to fulfill overseas demands for utilitarian tableware. Regarding technological execution, Vietnamese potters extensively utilized local iron-rich pigments to delineate sprigs of chrysanthemums with spontaneous, succinct lines in the center of the interior wells, while the interior and exterior rims were bordered by scrolling foliage. Concurrently, a select portion of high-end products began to assimilate the decorative compositions of late Yuan Dynasty Chinese blue-and-white porcelain, experimenting with the introduction of cobalt blue for painted designs, whilst maintaining iron-brown lines to demarcate the decorative registers. Constrained by contemporary levigation techniques for raw body clays and the firing limits of local kilns, and to prevent the stoneware bodies from collapsing or warping under intense kiln temperatures, Vietnamese potters devised a unique micro-morphological feature: fashioning the ring feet to be conspicuously wide and low. This structural element became the most recognizable localized hallmark of Vietnamese export ceramics from this period.

Following the successful expulsion of Ming forces and the restoration of national independence in AD 1427, the Vietnamese ceramic industry entered a century-long golden age under the patronage of the Lê Dynasty. During this epoch, the industry thrived profoundly, centered around the Chu Dau and Bat Trang kilns in the Red River Delta. This boom culminated not only in masterpieces such as the monumental blue-and-white vase currently housed in Turkey, which bears a definitive cyclical inscription corresponding to the eighth year of the Zhengho era (AD 1450), but also in the large-scale distribution of goods across island Southeast Asia, successfully capturing the market vacuum left by shifts in Chinese maritime policies. Conversely, direct exports from Vietnamese kilns to the main islands of Japan practically ground to a halt during this phase; instead, these wares entered the castles of the Ryukyu Kingdom as highly prized rarities, funneled through the kingdom’s international entrepôt trade networks. Throughout this production phase, Vietnamese potters demonstrated superlative command over complex decorative techniques, including mold-impressing, underglaze blue painting, and overglaze enameling. Whether producing octagonal pear-shaped vessels or delicate dishes with double-line lotus panels, they manifested a technical confidence that rivaled that of Jingdezhen in China. Meanwhile, a uniquely indigenous Vietnamese innovation—the application of a chocolate bottom, achieved by coating the interior base within the ring foot with a layer of ferruginous wash to prevent adhesion during firing—became a standardized convention for export merchandise.

By the mid-sixteenth century, the strict enforcement of maritime prohibitions by the Ming Dynasty generated an urgent demand in international markets for Southeast Asian commodities and raw silk. Leveraging its bountiful raw silk yields and advanced kiln industry, northern Vietnam emerged once more as a focal point of international trade. To cater directly to Japanese merchants arriving in Cochinchina aboard Shuinsen (Red Seal ships) from the 1590s onwards, the kilns of northern Vietnam embarked on large-scale, customized production tailored to foreign tastes. The most celebrated vessels from this period, dubbed tombo-wan (dragonfly bowls) or shibori-te by Japanese tea masters, were cylindrical tea bowls specifically adapted by Vietnamese potters to align with the rustic aesthetics of wabi-cha (grass-hut tea ceremony). Vietnamese workshops applied an indigenous high-calcium ash glaze over a white slip coat, leaving three spur marks on the interior base from the stack-firing process. To satisfy the Japanese tea masters’ predilection for asymmetry and the beauty of imperfection, the potters broke with conventional manufacturing standards, intentionally squeezing the walls of the bowls by hand to yield a warped, oval cross-section. Decoratively, Vietnamese painters completely departed from their standard dense, interlocking foliate scrolls, opting instead for minimalist, isolated strokes executed in domestic cobalt. This specific cobalt was dark and prone to bleeding within the soft glaze, creating images of dragonflies, prawns, birds, and bamboo grasses that evoked the natural, diffused quality of indigo-dyed textiles.

Nonetheless, this customized prosperity, heavily contingent upon a specific overseas market, encountered a catastrophic historical turning point between the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. With the total maturation of private kilns in Jingdezhen during the late Ming Dynasty—particularly the exponential surge in the production of Kraak porcelain and Ko-sometsuke (old blue-and-white), which was highly adapted to the Japanese market—Chinese porcelain, characterized by a more lustrous white body, flawlessly vitrified glaze, and highly competitive pricing, swept across global markets once more like a tidal wave. Faced with the formidable impact of Jingdezhen’s dual advantages in massive production capacity and technical supremacy, the competitive space for Vietnamese ceramics was ruthlessly restricted, both in its traditional strongholds in Southeast Asia and within the specialized tea-utensil market of Japan. This international ripple effect, triggered by the comprehensive resurgence of output and technological breakthroughs at Jingdezhen, directly precipitated an irreversible decline in Vietnamese export ceramics from the late sixteenth century onwards. By the mid-seventeenth century, the implementation of the maritime seclusion policy (sakoku) by Japan completely severed the Red Seal ship trade routes, bringing a formal end to the targeted, specialized production sustained for decades by the Red River Delta kilns. Consequently, Vietnamese ceramics gradually withdrew from the mainstream international export arena, reverting to a domestic industry dedicated to serving local populations and monastic religious institutions.

物件編號: P5

年代: late 15th–late 16th c. AD

材料: 陶瓷

尺寸: 14.7 x 6.9 cm

來源: 廣雅齋 2026

這是一個青花龜甲錦地花卉紋碗。

器型上,碗緣侈口,碗側斜腹,碗底為圈足,透明釉微泛青黃,釉面可見細密開片,呈現十五至十六世紀安南青花典型的胎釉風貌,這是由於越南窯場傳統上經常使用草木灰拌入釉料作為熔劑。外壁飾六角龜甲,或稱錢紋,因形似帶孔圓錢相疊,連續不斷的重複圖樣則稱為錦地,格內點綴小花,近足處繪變形蓮瓣紋或靈芝紋;內壁飾點線卷草花卉,碗心繪團花紋,中心花小,周圍纏枝紋。其中六角龜甲、花卉紋皆為明代常見紋飾。

此器紋樣承襲中國青花瓷的錦地、卷草、十字紋與蓮瓣等裝飾,然筆法粗略鬆動。青花邊緣微帶毛邊,這是由於青料被胎土稍微吸收後,使邊緣略帶暈開的感覺,於日本的茶器審美中,被稱為「絞手」,顏色較淡,部分筆觸甚至呈灰藍色,可能使用來自中國雲南的青料。越南青花底部可見鐵褐色洗底、露胎或透明釉等不同處理;本件圈足接地面露胎,微帶火石紅,足內底心未施釉。

器身外側可見多處有縮釉孔,可能是由於釉質的內應力不均所致。內側有多處串煙,是因窯內熱對流不佳所產生的黑斑。

在14世紀中期至15世紀初期,越南北部的窯廠(如昇龍周邊及早期缽場一帶)在外銷浪潮中展現了獨特的生命力,並將其施釉陶瓷的觸角延伸至日本的西大門。這一時期的越南製瓷工藝正處於從傳統向成熟青花轉型的過渡期,產品多為滿足海外日用膳食需求的大型盤、碗。在工藝表現上,越南陶工廣泛使用本土富含鐵質的彩料,在器物內底中心以率筆、洗練的線條勾勒出菊花折枝紋,內外口沿則圍繞著纏枝蔓草紋;部分高檔產品則開始吸收中國元代晚期青花瓷的裝飾構圖,嘗試引入鈷料進行彩繪,並以鐵褐彩線條作為紋飾的界線。受限於當時胎土原料的淘洗技術與窯爐燒成溫度,為了防止炻器質地的胎骨在窯火中軟塌變形,越南陶工發展出了一套獨特的微觀形制,即將底足製作得寬而低矮,這成為該時期越南外銷陶瓷最具辨識度的在地特徵。

隨著公元1427年越南成功驅逐明朝軍隊、恢復國家獨立,越南的陶瓷產業在黎朝的推動下迎來了長達一個世紀的黃金時代。這段時期,以紅河三角洲的朱豆窯和缽場窯為核心的窯業高度繁榮,不僅燒造出了現藏於土耳其、帶有1450年正和八年紀年的青花大瓶等巔峰之作,更將大量產品推向島嶼東南亞市場,成功填補了中國瓷器因政策轉變而留下的市場真空。然而此時,越南窯廠對更遙遠的日本本土主要島嶼的直接輸出幾乎處於停滯狀態,其產品主要藉由琉球王國的國際中轉貿易網絡,以極其珍稀的姿態進入琉球的御城之中。在這一階段的生產中,越南陶工展現出高超的模印、青花、以及釉上五彩的複合裝飾技藝,無論是八方梨形瓶還是細緻的雙線蓮瓣紋盤,都展現出與中國景德鎮分庭抗禮的技術自信。與此同時,越南本土獨創的底蓮工藝——在圈足內底塗抹一層防粘連的鐵汁,也在此時成為標準的外銷器物規範。

到了16世紀中期,由於明朝嚴格執行海禁,使得國際市場對東南亞物資與生絲的需求極其迫切。越南北部憑藉豐富的生絲產量與發達的窯業,再次成為國際貿易的風暴中心。為了迎合在1590年代以後搭乘朱印船直接前來交趾進行貿易的日本商人,越南北部的窯廠展開了大規模的客製化定向生產。這時期最著名、被日本茶人稱為蜻蜓盞或絞手的筒形茶碗,便是越南陶工為了適應海外草庵茶道審美而特別調整的產物。越南窯廠在白化妝土上施以特有的高鈣灰釉,並在內底留下了三個疊燒用的支釘痕;為了滿足日本茶人對不規則、殘缺美的追求,陶工打破常規的製瓷慣例,用手刻意擠壓碗腹,製造出歪斜的卵圓形橫截面。在裝飾上,越南畫工也完全背離了本土標準的繁密纏枝紋,改以簡練、孤立的筆觸,用深色且容易在軟釉中暈散的國產鈷料,勾勒出蜻蜓、蝦、鳥與竹草,創造出如藍染織物般自然洇散的絞手意境。

然而,這種高度依賴特定海外市場的客製化繁榮,在16世紀末至17世紀初遭遇了致命的歷史轉折。隨著中國明代末期景德鎮民窯體制的徹底成熟,特別是克拉克瓷與高度適應日本市場的古染付等外銷瓷產量出現幾何級數的大爆發,成色更為瑩白、釉面完美玻化且價格極具競爭力的中國瓷器重新如潮水般席捲全球。面對景德鎮這種兼具龐大產量與技術優勢的強烈衝擊,不論是在東南亞的傳統基本盤市場,還是日本的專門化茶道具市場,越南陶瓷的競爭空間都被無情地全面擠壓。這場由中國景德鎮產量全面復甦與技術爆發所引發的國際連帶效應,直接導致了越南外銷陶瓷自16世紀末開始走向無法逆轉的衰敗。到了17世紀中葉,隨著日本實施鎖國政策徹底切斷了朱印船航線,這段由紅河三角洲窯廠維繫了數十年的定向專門化生產正式宣告終結,越南陶瓷也逐步退出了國際外銷的主流舞台,回歸為本土與寺廟宗教服務的內銷產業。

類似/相同物件 請看:

美國 西華盛頓大學 惠廷頓亞洲陶瓷收藏 Whittington Collection of Asian Ceramics

https://mabel.wwu.edu/bowl-27#page/1

香港大學美術博物館 University Museum and Art Gallery, HKU

https://tipeslowly.github.io/ceramics/3_blue_and_white/#deepzoom-1642561394683367000

中國 贛州市客家文化遺產研究院 Ganzhou Hakka Cultural Heritage Research Institute

https://www.hakka0797.com/?hakkaPattern_35/2188.html

臺灣 國立故宮博物院 Naitional Palace Museum

https://digitalarchive.npm.gov.tw/Collection/Detail/76761?dep=U

臺灣 國立故宮博物院 Naitional Palace Museum

https://digitalarchive.npm.gov.tw/opendata/Pub/Detail/25911?dep=U&mode=full

更多相關訊息請參考:

Stevenson, John, and John Guy. Vietnamese Ceramics: A Separate Tradition. Chicago, Art Media Resources with Avery Press, 1997.

Richards, Dick. South-East Asian Ceramics: Thai, Vietnamese, and Khmer: From the Collection of the Art Gallery of South Australia. Selangor, Oxford University Press, 1995.

Kikuchi, Yuriko. A History of Maritime Trade in Northern Vietnam, 12th to 18th Centuries: Archaeological Investigations in Vandon and Phohien. Singapore, Springer Nature Singapore, 2021.

徐朝輝,《圖解明代瓷器工藝痕跡・明青花瓷卷》,成都:四川美術出版社,2012。

余繼明,《青花瓷片紋飾圖鑑》,杭州:浙江大學出版社,2007。

鄭培凱主編,《十二至十五世紀中國外銷瓷與海外貿易國際研討會論文集》,香港:中華書局(香港)有限公司,2005。

返回頂端